Hey #believeinfilm friends,
Today, I review Lomography Color Negative 800 film, which suspiciously looks like Portra 800—but it's not!
https://www.analog.cafe/r/lomography-color-negative-800-film-review-y45b
This film has some unique properties, though overall, it's an excellent stock with reasons to like it more than the Kodak-branded options. In the above article, I refer to an experiment with ISO 800 colour-negative film stocks my friends and I staged to determine if/how they're different.
@analog_cafe Kodak 800 is usually installed in their disposable cameras. There's millions of them languishing on shelves and it can be a cheaper way of getting that 800 iso colour film vibe. Look for bargains on the bay of evil or your favourite retailer.
@Jim_Graves I actually tested this theory earlier! Here: https://www.analog.cafe/r/all-the-iso-800-colour-films-compared-b5eu
The film is indeed very similar but it’s not the same thing as my scans and its physical properties revealed. But it (the FunSaver film) may be the same as Flic Film Aurora, which is relatively cheap.
